MANTRA DAO (OM)

This whole situation with @okx is wild. @jp_mullin888 asked two very simple questions that any transparent exchange should answer instantly: 1. How many user $OM tokens are you actually migrating? 2. How many $OM tokens does OKX itself hold and plan to migrate? Instead of answering, OKX only “updated the schedule” and dodged the real issue… again. And this part matters even more: External counsel has already advised that $OM tokens believed to be held by OKX are tied to ongoing litigation alleging potential misconduct. That means @MANTRA_Chain legally cannot interact with those tokens and OKX still hasn’t clarified whether they plan to move them or not. Meanwhile, JP is doing everything publicly so the community isn’t left in the dark. OKX hasn’t responded to him directly since April, and now when he asks straightforward questions, they’re avoiding them. This isn’t about drama, it’s about protecting $OM holders and ensuring the migration is clean, legal, and safe. OKX needs to publicly confirm the nu

I wonder what's going on with @okx regarding MANTRA... we had that pricing incident in APRIL where OKX was repeatedly asked to comment on the situation, leaving many questions unanswered, and they remained silent forever. Now, after months, they're back with false information about the migration... Hey! OKX, it's time to stop running away... As a fierce supporter of the MANTRA community, and speaking as a keen observer, it's impossible to ignore your actions (OKX). The entire community is watching, questioning, and no one will accept this lack of clarity from you anymore. So let's get straight to the point, without beating around the bush or evasive answers: 1. How many OM tokens belonging to OKX users need to be migrated? What is the real number, without mystery or concealment? 2. How many OM tokens are in OKX's own balance sheet? 3. Why are you carrying out a migration procedure completely different from what MANTRA says? 4. What is your real intention with MANTRA? Can we expect another aggressive a

Spent some time digging into @openmind_agi's latest moves, and it's clear they're not just tinkering with AI they're laying the rails for robots to actually join the economy. Take their partnership with @virtuals_io: AI agents can now issue commands to real robots, pull live sensor data, execute tasks, and settle payments on-chain automatically. No humans in the loop, just machines transacting value. This hits on why crypto is non-negotiable for robotics: ⦿ Identity: Robots prove they're legit without big tech gatekeepers ZK proofs handle that on a permissionless layer ⦿ Coordination: Brands like Unitree or Boston Dynamics couldn't collaborate before; now shared protocols let fleets sync up across chains ⦿ Economics: Energy top-ups, API calls, data trades all settled in $OM or stables, turning downtime into gig work OM1's the brain giving devs freedom to script personalities (remember that sarcastic Unitree G1?), while Fabric decentralizes the execution. Result? A stack where one dev flips a robot into an entertainer, and soon that's baseline for autonomous ops. We're heading to a world where your home bot hails a delivery drone, pays in crypto, and splits the tip @openmind_agi is shipping the first mile. If you're not positioning now, you'll be hailing manually later What robot task would you automate first?

MANTRA Token Upgrade is live: $OM holders must migrate before the deadline to secure the 4:1 split and receive the new $MANTRA tokens. Don’t miss out! https://t.co/mzyJQBxH8f

MANTRA Token Upgrade is live: $OM holders must migrate before the deadline to secure the 4:1 split and receive the new $MANTRA tokens. Don’t miss out! https://t.co/bXgZDmk9hp