Curve DAO Token (CRV)

$0.236 -0.42% 24H

35
社交熱度指數(SSI)
-41.39% (24h)
#137
市場預警排名(MPR)
-61
1
24小時社交提及量
-80.00% (24h)
100%
24小時KOL看好比例
1位活躍KOL
概要
River's collaboration with Curve enhances liquidity and composability, seen as an infrastructure positive, but CRV slipped slightly down 0.84% with a sharp drop in social heat.
看漲訊號
- River integration
- Liquidity improvement
- Smoother routing
- Strong DeFi composability
- Infrastructure focus
看跌訊號
- Slight price decline
- Social heat sharply drops
- Overall sentiment cools
- No increase in trading volume
- Short-term bearish sentiment

社交熱度指數(SSI)

總體資料
35
SSI
社交熱度趨勢(7D)
價格(7D)
情緒分佈
看漲 (100%)
社交熱度洞察
CRV social heat is low (35.37/100, -41.39%), activity sharply drops 80% and KOL attention falls 90%, positive sentiment rises 52% driven by River partnership benefits.

市場預警排名(MPR)

預警解讀
CRV warning rank fell to #137 (↓61), social anomaly score only 6.7, sentiment polarization rose to 50, KOL attention down 88%, liquidity improvement did not translate into trading volume correlation.

相關推文

Mr. X Influencer Educator C
84.71K @TheMrX
When a protocol like @CurveFinance integrates something, it usually means the infrastructure actually matters @RiverdotInc pushing deeper into Curve feels bigger than just another partnership headline Better stablecoin liquidity, smoother routing, and stronger DeFi composability all strengthen the foundation around $RIVER Feels like River is focusing less on noise and more on becoming useful infrastructure across ecosystems
34 31 275
閱讀原文 >
釋出後CRV走勢
看漲
River deeply integrates with Curve, enhancing $RIVER's value in DeFi infrastructure.
DeFi Warhol DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst B
52.01K @Defi_Warhol
DeFi Warhol DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst B
52.01K @Defi_Warhol
I was looking through @tokenterminal and noticed something interesting about how DEXs rank when you compare total volume vs avg volume per user ↓ @CurveFinance: $100.5K in vol per user vs. $9.7B 30d volume @0xfluid: $44.2K in vol per user vs. $7.8B 30d volume @PharaohExchange: $39.2K in vol per user vs. $900.9M 30d volume @CoWSwap: $36.6K in vol per user vs. $3.67B 30d volume @tokenlon: $28.2K in vol per user vs. $304M 30d volume @KyberNetwork: $19.8K in vol per user vs. $8.69B 30d volume @AerodromeFi: $17.1K in vol per user vs. $12.5B 30d volume @LFJ_gg: $16.4K in vol per user vs. $1.4B 30d volume @orca_so: $13.5K in vol per user vs. $5.7B 30d volume @Uniswap: $6.3K in vol per user vs. $44.3B 30d volume NGL, the gap is pretty insane, but I think that’s the point. Because the 30d volume shows how much was traded overall while the avg volume per user shows if that volume came from big traders or lots of smaller users.
137 31 6.79K
閱讀原文 >
釋出後CRV走勢
中性
The tweet compares total DEX trading volume with per-user volume, revealing differences in user behavior across different DEXs.
Jacob Brown DeFi_Expert Media C
8.01K @JakeBlockchain
BitcoinYield D
1.11K @bitcoin_yield
Interviewing @newmichwill tomorrow. Co-Founder of innovative protocols @CurveFinance & @yieldbasis. YieldBasis specifically is interesting as it aims to solve the issue of impermanent loss. Opening the door for >10% returns common in AMMs. Drop your questions below 👇
16 6 1.55K
閱讀原文 >
釋出後CRV走勢
看漲
CRV-related YieldBasis is expected to reduce impermanent loss and achieve >10% returns
Michael Egorov Founder DeFi_Expert B
42.99K @newmichwill
yieldbasis D
34.81K @yieldbasis
big week for @yieldbasis stay tuned. https://t.co/zRfr6VWZI9
48 1 7.13K
閱讀原文 >
釋出後CRV走勢
極度看漲
YieldBasis project enters a big week, with its governance proposal on Curve receiving 100% support.
Coinpedia Media Educator D
16.14K @CoinpediaNews
May 2026 #DEX Leaders by Average Trading Volume per User ◾️May 2026 shows strong on-chain activity as @CurveFinance leads DEX trading with $102K MTD volume, nearly 2x @tokenlon. ◾️@0xfluid and @PharaohExchange also cross $35K each, while average trading volume per user hits $712.4. #CoinPedia #CryptoNews #Blockchain #CryptoMarket
14 4 1.08K
閱讀原文 >
釋出後CRV走勢
看漲
Curve leads the DEX market with a monthly trading volume of $102K.
Osemka TA_Analyst Trader A
19.65K @Osemka8
[ $CRV ]\n\nRound 2 of dumping to $1 soon? https://t.co/xxzIzd5qx7
Osemka TA_Analyst Trader A
19.65K @Osemka8
[ $CRV ]\n\nDump this shit to $1. Distribution complete. https://t.co/N2CuK3Nx7a
147 10 15.68K
閱讀原文 >
釋出後CRV走勢
極度看跌
The CRV distribution phase is complete, expected to undergo a second round crash to $1.
DeFi Warhol DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst B
52.01K @Defi_Warhol
I was looking through @tokenterminal and noticed something interesting about how DEXs rank when you compare total volume vs avg volume per user ↓ @CurveFinance: $100.5K in vol per user vs. $9.7B 30d volume @0xfluid: $44.2K in vol per user vs. $7.8B 30d volume @PharaohExchange: $39.2K in vol per user vs. $900.9M 30d volume @CoWSwap: $36.6K in vol per user vs. $3.67B 30d volume @tokenlon: $28.2K in vol per user vs. $304M 30d volume @KyberNetwork: $19.8K in vol per user vs. $8.69B 30d volume @AerodromeFi: $17.1K in vol per user vs. $12.5B 30d volume @LFJ_gg: $16.4K in vol per user vs. $1.4B 30d volume @orca_so: $13.5K in vol per user vs. $5.7B 30d volume @Uniswap: $6.3K in vol per user vs. $44.3B 30d volume NGL, the gap is pretty insane, but I think that’s the point. Because the 30d volume shows how much was traded overall while the avg volume per user shows if that volume came from big traders or lots of smaller users.
137 31 6.79K
閱讀原文 >
釋出後CRV走勢
中性
The tweet compares total DEX trading volume with per-user volume, revealing differences in user behavior across different DEXs.
🐺 FREKI ANCIENT CRYPTO OG 2011 | HBAR XRP BTC FLR Influencer Media B
10.75K @Freki_OG
CrediBULL Crypto TA_Analyst Trader C
483.32K @CredibleCrypto
Our range low/base has held so far, the local supply zone above (red) will now need to be reclaimed for continuation higher. This could take a couple of weeks to play out but any consolidation at these levels is healthy and just means a more sustainable rally if/when we do clear the supply zone above. This is also predicated on no violent drops from $BTC which is still technically holding it's relevant support zone as well. $CRV
466 35 69.07K
閱讀原文 >
釋出後CRV走勢
看漲
CRV holds its bottom support and is expected to rise healthily after breaking the supply zone, provided BTC remains stable.
Digital Perspectives Media Influencer B
208.92K @DigPerspectives
CrediBULL Crypto TA_Analyst Trader C
483.32K @CredibleCrypto
Our range low/base has held so far, the local supply zone above (red) will now need to be reclaimed for continuation higher. This could take a couple of weeks to play out but any consolidation at these levels is healthy and just means a more sustainable rally if/when we do clear the supply zone above. This is also predicated on no violent drops from $BTC which is still technically holding it's relevant support zone as well. $CRV
466 35 69.07K
閱讀原文 >
釋出後CRV走勢
看漲
CRV holds bottom support; if it breaks through the red supply zone, a sustainable rise is expected.
CrediBULL Crypto TA_Analyst Trader C
483.32K @CredibleCrypto
We've pulled back from our range highs and are now re-testing our triple tap base that we formed earlier. We know that in a bullish environment this retest is normal/fine but the range in which the triple tap base was formed should then act as support on a retest. We can push deeper into the range- but ideally we don't want the range lows (base of triple tap) breached. This is when we would want to see buyers step in on the dip. $CRV
441 44 145.37K
閱讀原文 >
釋出後CRV走勢
看漲
After CRV pulled back, it is retesting support, has reached the short-term target, and after breaking the 0.35‑0.40 resistance it could rise to $1.60‑$2.

KOL態度

Mr. X C
看漲