187.7K @CryptoBusy Major token unlocks are hitting the market this week! 🚨
Projects like $HYPER, $INIT, and $ZRO are releasing supply, adding potential sell pressure across these assets.
Larger unlock percentages tend to have stronger short-term impact.
Increased circulating supply can weigh on price if demand doesn’t match.
Strong absorption would signal healthy market conditions.
This is where unlocks can drive short-term volatility and positioning opportunities.
85
9
8.9K
245.1K @martypartymusic SEC Filings after market close: @Bitwise file a @HyperliquidX S-1/A Amendment to their ETF application, updating ticker to BHYP listed on NYSE.
S-1: https://t.co/e7DXCUE7Xn
S-1/A: https://t.co/KK1zA5aCh2 https://t.co/YkRxpJhfAP
23
2
5.4K
41.5K @Defi_Warhol Retail keeps blaming insider allocation for why 2025 tokens dumped.
But the story is a lot more complicated than that.
After years of retail backlash over insider-heavy distributions, projects started marketing "fair launches" and reducing allocations to teams and investors.
This was a better narrative, though the outcomes stayed the same.
I analyzed the 10 biggest launches from last year:
@monad: 46.7% insiders (27% team + 19.7% investors) → -6.4%
@hyperlane: 35.5% insiders (25% team + 10.5% early backers) → +66.6%
@animecoin: 23% insiders → -95.5%
@berachain: 51% insiders (34.3% investors + 16.8% contributors) → -94.2%
@StoryProtocol: 41.6% insiders (21.6% backers + 20% contributors) → -20%
@KaitoAI: 33.3% insiders (25% core + 8.3% early backers) → -73.2%
@LineaBuild: 0% insiders, only 15% treasury → -89.1%
@MeteoraAG: 18% insiders (team allocation) → -73.7%
@MidnightNtwrk: ~0% insiders (most of supply in foundation) → +27.5%
$TRUMP: 80% insiders (Trump-affiliated entities) → biggest scam of 2025
Only
129
20
6.2K
