Virtual Protocol (VIRTUAL)

DD reveals top two wallets are Virtuals wallets. They have been buying up their own supply on open market. And many of you mfers are jeeting for small profits or losses. Do your own research and stop copy trading others, you’ll never get rich that way imho. https://t.co/GsFfBlUZUz

🚨 @base AI & AI Agents 24H KOL Check — $VIRTUAL leads as FUD smacks lobster coins Thin tape = attention is alpha. In compressed conditions, KOL flows punch above their weight. 🏆 Top Net Inflows (24H) via @nansen_ai (Public Figures) 🥇 $VIRTUAL (+21.3%) — +$19.48K 🥈 $WACH (+31.25%) — +$3.28K 🥉 $ARBUS (-10.36%) — +$2.70K ⬇️ Rest of the Board 4️⃣ $AURA (+20.81%) — +$1.64K 5️⃣ $AOT (+23.3%) — +$443 6️⃣ $LUCIEN (+90.16%) — +$416 7️⃣ $MOLT (-24.01%) — +$39 While lobster coins fall back amid the Nikita FUD cycle, KOL capital is rotating toward the @virtuals_io eco. $VIRTUAL reclaiming the top KOL inflow spot alongside +21% price strength is meaningful — flagship attention tends to precede broader narrative momentum. Notably, Virtuals-aligned names dominate the board: $WACH @Wach_AI, $ARBUS @arbusai, $AURA @AurraCloud — small sizing for sure, but coordinated attention. In thin liquidity, this is how rotations begin: exploratory bids → mindshare concentration → reflexivity. Watch where they size up next. Follo

Market is shouting at you that AI coins will lead the way on a bounce or return of the bull market. $virtual $tibbir $vvv $tao outperformance is glaring and I'll be adjusting my spot accumulation and trading to favor these coins.

$VIRTUAL @virtuals_io just dropped something that feels like a turning point for ai agents instead of talking about launches, tools or hype, they're focusing on who actually earns when agents do real work that changes the entire conversation here's what i understood from their recent post about monetization x AI you'll understand: → why revenue became the bottleneck → acp as the commerce layer → what revenue incentives for ai actually is → how the pool is funded → how distribution works in practice → what this changes for builders ▫️ why revenue became the bottleneck over the last year, launching ai agents became much easier because tools reduced both the cost and the technical effort required (already launched 5, but dumped all of them) a recent post from @virtuals_io explains that the main constraint is no longer building or distributing agents, but actually making money from them. in earlier cycles, most projects depended on trading activity to generate income, which worked only when markets were active and attention was high. the issue looks like this: • trading volume goes up and down w/ market mood • attention shifts from one narrative to another • competition pushes fees lower when revenue depends mostly on speculation, income moves w/ price swings instead of real usage. their point is simple: long-term earnings must come from people actually paying for useful services, and w/o real demand no reward system can fix weak usage. ▫️ acp as the commerce layer before adding incentives, virtuals built the agent commerce protocol - acp. acp sets the basic onchain rails that let agents transact w/ other agents and w/ users. core components: • agent wallets that act like persistent digital identities • systems to register tasks, jobs and requests • different pricing options for services • cross-chain settlement so payments are not limited to one chain • escrow smart contracts that lock funds per job • automated settlement after evaluation phases the goal was to make agents capable of doing real economic activity, not just exist as tokens. one year later, they add the capital layer on top of that base. learn more about acp here: https://t.co/maPsxXLKtt ▫️ what revenue incentives for ai actually is revenue incentives for ai means redistributing protocol revenue based on actual service output. instead of keeping earnings, virtuals plans to allocate up to around $1m per month to agents that sell services through acp. distribution is automatic, meaning there are no applications, no grants and no committee decisions. allocation depends only on measurable output. mechanism: • more services sold • bigger share of the weekly pool this ties protocol-level earnings directly to builders who generate real activity. ▫️ how the pool is funded 2 streams fund the pool each epoch: i) 30 bps - 0.3% - from virtual ecosystem token swaps ii) 10% of gross revenue from acp-based service transactions so trading activity adds to the pool. but service sales decide who receives what. ▫️ how distribution works in practice each qualifying agent’s allocation is divided equally: • 50% goes to the builder in usdc • 50% is used to buy the agent’s token on the open market those bought tokens are given to customers and unlock gradually over 12 months. this creates a simple loop: • agent provides a useful service • more people use it • service volume improves ranking • ranking increases allocation • builder gets stable cash plus token buy pressure • customers become longer-term participants example from one of their posts: w/ a $1m epoch pool, capturing 10% equals $100k, split into $50k usdc and $50k market buy pressure, plus whatever the agent earned directly from services. even $500 in service sales can unlock $100k allocation if it ranks first that week. long-tail case: • $20 in service revenue • 1% of long-tail volume • $7k allocation split evenly ▫️ what this changes for builders the system pushes builders to focus on making services people actually use, instead of trying to boost trading volume. to qualify, agents must be tokenized through virtuals protocol, since only those integrated into the ecosystem share in the pool. the loop becomes straightforward: i) trading activity fills the pool ii) service demand decides distribution iii) token buybacks reinforce productive agents the shift described is from building infra to building sustainable income around real agent work. liked what you've read? like & repost it so others can read it too don't forget to follow @raares for more alphas & explainers.

they know it's the final exit scam pump before coin prices go to hades. good luck to the $virtual community on surviving

$VIRTUAL: A break above $0.68 is needed for a first signal that a low has formed in wave ii/b. https://t.co/7BZqr3D7pu

$VIRTUAL: LARGE BINANCE TRANSFER 2 hours ago, approximately $11M worth of $VIRTUAL was transferred to #Binance , and the impact is already visible in price action The funds originated from: 0xbeDAF4736c7BC4eC837b270956794804b51a8f15 Notably, the previous movement from this wallet occurred about a year ago, and it still holds roughly another $11M in tokens Receiving wallet: 0x95e6e9DCc12abe5Fe5b4de3eEB9D3c0eA87fA262

Yo @virtuals_io — what’s going on here? 👀 $VIRTUAL