NEO (NEO)

#NEO Descending Channel Midline Breakout💁‍♂️ The token is nearing a breakout from the descending channel's midline on the 2D chart🔍 The chart shows strong momentum and indicates that buyers are ready to drive prices higher👀 Targets after a successful breakout: $3.00 → $3.40 → $4.40 → $5.50 → $6.50 → $7.75🎯

Save 10% of whatever you earn Savings is not an investment , but savings is required for investment. I am not speaking from lack of experience. I started trading when I was earning 60k as a banker and was investing 10% of my earnings , in $Neo. I did that for 1year and $Neo moved from $4-$5 to over $150 in 2021/2022 bull run. I know it is not easy, it doesn’t have to be easy, it just has to be done .

do you guys remember neo? saw so many people hyped about this last year few even ordered the robot and paid so any update on this or did they rugged already? been month since they posted anything on x https://t.co/LlFmKjOhKf

Ha ha, this is interesting: at the beginning of the year, the two Neo founders publicly sparred and forced out something they wouldn't normally do: publishing 12 years of financials. When I first got into $NEO, it was still called Little Ant; that generation of public blockchains has many names that no one mentions today. So when I saw this financial report, the most surprising thing wasn't that it’s still alive, but that it’s actually doing quite well: In 2014, assets were about $5.2 million, and by 2025 they reached $461 million. That’s impressive—projects that can survive across cycles are rare, and those that can build substantial returns are even rarer, because the industry norm is that many projects look wealthy in bull markets but disappear once a bear market hits, either by selling tokens to stay afloat, encountering internal problems, or having a mess of asset management, ultimately leading to a soft exit or outright failure. So why can Neo survive? The report makes it clear: over the years they have hardly relied on selling NEO to sustain operations; the money mainly comes from on-chain GAS revenue and investment returns, meaning cash flow is well maintained. So the question arises. Which projects in this industry do you think can truly survive for more than a decade, and what exactly keeps them alive?

In the interview "Zhang Li Interview NEO Co‑founder Zhang Zhengwen: Da Hongfei Should Not Keep Issuing Tokens" years ago Da Hongfei suggested that having two people jointly overseeing the Neo Foundation would slow Neo's development, leading to low decision‑making efficiency. His view is simple: "Either you leave, or I stay. I accept either outcome."; currently Neo is governed by the two founders ruling separately, with no cooperation at all, perhaps due to the bear market, the community seems to passively accept this state; the optimistic side is that both founders are still actively engaging with the community and have a detailed roadmap. Read the full article: https://t.co/UIE6RUtTBQ

$NEO is moving inside a well-defined range between $2.96 resistance and $2.54 support. A breakout from either side should determine the next short-term trend. https://t.co/TgTgTHsXeh

A few days ago, during Uncle Da's @dahongfei AMA, he mentioned "Giveback 2". He didn't elaborate, but the vague meaning is: Is it possible that there will be another Giveback in the future? I was actually a bit shocked when I heard it. Because many newcomers may not know that NEO actually did a Giveback back in the day. In 2017, NEO launched a Giveback Program. Back then, during the Antshares era, there was a crowdfunding, and after the project developed, the team made a rare decision: To return all the BTC raised at the original price to early supporters. And the most critical point is: NEO does not need to be returned. The BTC is returned directly, NEO remains in the investors' hands. I am actually one of those people. Back then I invested 18.2 BTC, and later that BTC was indeed returned. Honestly, in the entire crypto industry, this kind of thing is extremely rare. The vast majority of projects operate on the logic that: The money raised is the project's money. Investors bear the risk. But NEO's logic at the time was actually very simple: People supported the project back then, Now the project has grown, so return the money to them. You keep the NEO. This decision caused quite a stir in the community back then, many old OGs probably still remember. Looking at this financial report, many things become easier to understand. The NEO treasury is now about $460 million. $118 million cash over 1,100 BTC over 40 million NEO over 40 million GAS And the annual expenditure is roughly $18 million. To put it simply: There are plenty of bullets in the vault. Now NEO's ecosystem is indeed not the most active, that's a fact. But the crypto industry has a very realistic rule: Many projects don't fail because of technology, but because the money ran out first. When the cycle changes, the team disbands. But if a project has: Lots of money on the balance sheet The team is still there The technology is still there Then as long as new opportunities arise in the industry, it has the capability to capture another round. So after reading this report, my biggest feeling is actually simple: NEO may not be the hottest chain right now. But this project has always had a special aspect. During the hottest bull market back then, it returned the fundraising money to the community. And after many years have passed, its treasury remains thick. If someday in the future there is a Giveback 2, it could really become a very rare event in the entire crypto history.