Meteora (MET)

Aaron J. Mars spun up MiroShark. The autonomous fleet burned 1.56B tokens across 40+ models. One week in it shipped 183 PRs and started reporting vulns straight to Google. Meanwhile CT is sweating DAMM v2 boosts for the $MET Season 2 snapshot.

8 #Crypto Buybacks Beat Supply Growth ➡️ $MET (57.87%), $PUMP (31.50%), and $GMX (19.91%) lead the projects buying back more tokens than their supply growth. ➡️ $HYPE tops the list by buyback value with $283.43M. #CoinPedia #Crypto #Web3‌‌

Morning timeline all paid X, congratulations to all brothers! 8 projects have token buyback amounts exceeding supply From Jan 2026 to now, 8 projects have recorded token buyback amounts that exceed the rate of circulating supply increase: "MET, PUMP, GMX, RLB, MPLX, HYPE, LIT and AAVE". HYPE leads in token buyback value with $283 million, equivalent to 3% of the supply, while total circulating supply decreased by 11% year‑over‑year.

Tokenomist: 8 Crypto Projects' Buybacks Outpaced Supply Growth Since January, with HYPE Buybacks Reaching $283M According to Tokenomist, since January 2026, eight crypto projects have seen token buybacks outpace growth in circulating supply: MET, PUMP, GMX, RLB, MPLX, HYPE, LIT, and AAVE. Meteora (MET) had the largest relative impact on circulating supply, with supply rising only 13% while buybacks equaled 71% of its January supply. Hyperliquid (HYPE), meanwhile, recorded the largest buyback by dollar value at $283 million, equal to 3% of supply, while its supply fell 11% over the same period.

Wu said that according to Tokenomist data, since January 2026, eight crypto projects have repurchased tokens at a rate exceeding the growth of their circulating supply. They are MET, PUMP, GMX, RLB, MPLX, HYPE, LIT and AAVE. The data shows that Meteora (MET) had the greatest impact on its circulating supply, with supply increasing only 13% but the repurchase amount equivalent to 71% of the January supply; on the other hand, Hyperliquid (HYPE) set a record for the largest repurchase by dollar value, amounting to $283 million (3% of supply, while supply shrank 11% over the same period). https://t.co/mb3KVjm2e5

🚨 8 tokens where buybacks outpaced circulating supply growth since Jan. 2026 When a project buyback tokens it's trying to offset new supply entering the market. But when supply grows faster than the buyback, it barely makes a dent. Take Meteora as an example. Its circulating supply went from 472.8M on Jan. 1, 2026 to 535.4M today, up 13.2%. Over the same period, it bought back 336.2M tokens worth $45.75M, equal to 71% of its Jan. 1 supply. Meteora bought back far more tokens than its supply grew by. The same pattern shows up across these projects: • $MET - Buybacks: 71% | Supply growth: +13% • $PUMP - Buybacks: 7% | Supply growth: -24% • $GMX - Buybacks: 21% | Supply growth: +1% • $RLB - Buybacks: 10% | Supply growth: -8% • $MPLX - Buybacks: 8% | Supply growth: -8% • $HYPE - Buybacks: 3% ($283M) | Supply growth: -11% • $LIT - Buybacks: 1% | Supply growth: 0% • $AAVE - Buybacks: 1% | Supply growth: +1% Key Insight Hyperliquid recorded the largest buyback program by value ($283M), but Meteora's buybacks had the biggest impact relative to its circulating supply.

MC / Ann Rev experiment: Week 3 Update Three weeks ago, I bought $1,000 of each asset with a low MC / annualized revenue. Last week the profit cooled to +$688. This week it more than doubled. - Original basket: $10,000 invested - Current PnL: +$1,550.43 - ROI: +15.5% ORE and MPLX both flipped from red to green this week, and PUMP got back most of last week's loss. The new addition, MAPLE, more than made up for GMX's idle price action. Will pull the plug for @helium (HNT) next week. Gave it many chances, and I'm not gonna let it ruin the fun I'm having so far. In all honesty, this metric might be a hidden gold mine.

breakout imminent on $met https://t.co/ghDKHq7L1w