INVESTIVE (IN)

In the last 24 hours, $IN dropped from $0.09 to $0.08. The market feels completely indecisive right now. We had some green earlier, and now everything’s back to red. I’m honestly curious about what’s causing the swings. I was expecting the @Infinit_Labs token to bounce back and push toward $0.10 again, but it hasn’t happened. At this point, I’m starting to doubt whether it’s still possible this year.

i’ve been revisiting the $IN token distribution, and the structure says a lot about @Infinit_Labs’ long-term intent. nearly half the supply (49.5%) goes to the community + ecosystem, which is rare in a sector where teams usually dominate allocations. the 5% airdrop for early users, stone holders, yappers, and discord contributors is a clean way to reward the people who actually showed up early. then you’ve got contributors and investors balanced at 20% and 25.5%, which feels healthy enough to support growth without overpowering governance. overall? it’s one of the few tokenomics setups where decentralization isn’t just marketing, it’s structurally baked in. the future agent economy will need broad ownership, and this looks aligned with that direction.

i’ve been revisiting the $IN token distribution, and the structure says a lot about @Infinit_Labs’ long-term intent. nearly half the supply (49.5%) goes to the community + ecosystem, which is rare in a sector where teams usually dominate allocations. the 5% airdrop for early users, stone holders, yappers, and discord contributors is a clean way to reward the people who actually showed up early. then you’ve got contributors and investors balanced at 20% and 25.5%, which feels healthy enough to support growth without overpowering governance. overall? it’s one of the few tokenomics setups where decentralization isn’t just marketing, it’s structurally baked in. the future agent economy will need broad ownership, and this looks aligned with that direction.

i’ve been revisiting the $IN token distribution, and the structure says a lot about @Infinit_Labs’ long-term intent. nearly half the supply (49.5%) goes to the community + ecosystem, which is rare in a sector where teams usually dominate allocations. the 5% airdrop for early users, stone holders, yappers, and discord contributors is a clean way to reward the people who actually showed up early. then you’ve got contributors and investors balanced at 20% and 25.5%, which feels healthy enough to support growth without overpowering governance. overall? it’s one of the few tokenomics setups where decentralization isn’t just marketing, it’s structurally baked in. the future agent economy will need broad ownership, and this looks aligned with that direction.

i’ve been revisiting the $IN token distribution, and the structure says a lot about @Infinit_Labs’ long-term intent. nearly half the supply (49.5%) goes to the community + ecosystem, which is rare in a sector where teams usually dominate allocations. the 5% airdrop for early users, stone holders, yappers, and discord contributors is a clean way to reward the people who actually showed up early. then you’ve got contributors and investors balanced at 20% and 25.5%, which feels healthy enough to support growth without overpowering governance. overall? it’s one of the few tokenomics setups where decentralization isn’t just marketing, it’s structurally baked in. the future agent economy will need broad ownership, and this looks aligned with that direction.

Quick how-to for anyone trying to put stables to work without dApp hopping: I used @Infinit_Labs to describe my intent in plain English “earn ~26.75% APR on stablecoins with auto-management” and the Agent Swarm turned it into a one-click, non-custodial execution across protocols. It simulated routes, verified each step on-chain, then deployed LP on vbUSDC/vbUSDT via Spectra to maximize KAT rewards. No spreadsheets, no bridging stress, no guessing 🧠⚙️ What I liked most: every operation is deterministic and auditable, and I can set rebalancing + safety rails so the strategy stays aligned with my risk. If you’ve been stuck between noisy “alpha” and clunky execution, this feels like the missing strategy layer for #DeFi Also, if you’re curious about Prompt-to-DeFi and creator monetization, the community call is tomorrow at 11AM UTC good chance to learn how intents become full strategies end-to-end Staying locked on $IN and dialing in more strategies this week. Who else is optimizing stables with #AgenticDeFi ri

i’ve been revisiting the $IN token distribution, and the structure says a lot about @Infinit_Labs’ long-term intent. nearly half the supply (49.5%) goes to the community + ecosystem, which is rare in a sector where teams usually dominate allocations. the 5% airdrop for early users, stone holders, yappers, and discord contributors is a clean way to reward the people who actually showed up early. then you’ve got contributors and investors balanced at 20% and 25.5%, which feels healthy enough to support growth without overpowering governance. overall? it’s one of the few tokenomics setups where decentralization isn’t just marketing, it’s structurally baked in. the future agent economy will need broad ownership, and this looks aligned with that direction.

i’ve been revisiting the $IN token distribution, and the structure says a lot about @Infinit_Labs’ long-term intent. nearly half the supply (49.5%) goes to the community + ecosystem, which is rare in a sector where teams usually dominate allocations. the 5% airdrop for early users, stone holders, yappers, and discord contributors is a clean way to reward the people who actually showed up early. then you’ve got contributors and investors balanced at 20% and 25.5%, which feels healthy enough to support growth without overpowering governance. overall? it’s one of the few tokenomics setups where decentralization isn’t just marketing, it’s structurally baked in. the future agent economy will need broad ownership, and this looks aligned with that direction.