CoinUp.io (CP)

I want to raise a concern regarding the recent campaign by @cityprotocolHQ that started on Feb 23 and was scheduled to end March 13, with a $20,000 $CP reward pool for the top 500 contributors, hosted on the Base App.

Like many others, I invested significant time creating content and supporting the ecosystem.

Around the evening of March 12, the platform began behaving unexpectedly.

Engagement and interest tracking on the leaderboard appeared to stop updating properly.

Since then, many contributors (including myself) have noticed that mindshare stopped updating rather it keeps dropping significantly, regardless of continued activity.

The concern here is not simply about rankings.

The bigger issue is transparency and communication. For almost five days now , contributors have not received any official clarification about what is happening with the leaderboard or campaign tracking.
Many of us are currently unsure about several important points:

• Was a snapshot already taken?
• What caused the leaderboard malfunction?
• Why are users unable to log in or access the platform properly?
• Some contributors current rankings don’t match their standings as of March 12.

There are also questions around earlier campaign information.

During the Galxe campaign, it was mentioned that TGE could happen in Q1. It would be helpful to know if there have been any adjustments to that timeline.

Since this campaign was hosted through the @baseapp , it would also be helpful to understand whether this issue is related to campaign-side tracking or platform infrastructure.

Clarification on this would help the community better understand the situation.

What makes the situation more confusing is that during this time, official posts from @cityprotocolHQ have continued to focus on partnerships and other announcements while the campaign issue remains unaddressed.

For contributors who helped amplify the project, this silence is concerning.

I want to emphasize that this thread is not an attack.

I believe in the vision of City Protocol and have actively supported the ecosystem through content and participation. That’s exactly why transparency matters here.

Campaigns like this rely heavily on community effort and attention. When contributors dedicate time and energy, it’s important that the systems tracking their work function correctly.

And if issues arise, timely updates from the team make a big difference.

It would also greatly help if the team could consider creating official Telegram or Discord channels where contributors can interact directly with the team and receive updates more quickly.

I respectfully ask the @cityprotocolHQ team (and relevant team members ) for clarification.

The community simply needs clear communication and reassurance.

Many contributors have worked hard throughout this campaign, and everyone deserves clarity about how their efforts will be evaluated.

Looking forward to an update from the team.

📢 CP Liquidity Update

After testing the CP–GLMR pool, we realized that the risk of impermanent loss is too high.

👉 To reduce risks and optimize actual returns, next week we will open a vote to increase rewards for the CP–USDT pool.

With USDT pegged at 1 USD, the CP–USDT pool will:
✅ Minimize impermanent loss
✅ Provide more accurate interest rate calculations
✅ Deliver sustainable benefits for LPs

🔥 Join the vote and support CP–USDT to receive safer and more stable rewards!
https://t.co/uwT37JShdg