Uniswap (UNI)

$3.598  +2.74%  24H

Índice de sentimiento social (ISS)

Clasificación del pulso del mercado (CPM)

Publicaciones de X

  • Tony Edward (Thinking Crypto Podcast) Media Influencer B
     140.60K  @thinkingcrypto
    Brecca Stoll D
     18.01K  @breccastoll

    SCOOP: The Trump Admin just tapped leading CEOs in crypto, finance, prediction markets, and more for a BRAND NEW government advisory committee. Coinbases’s Brian Armstrong, Robinhood’s Vlad Tenev, and Polymarket’s Shayne Coplan are among the 35 named. https://t.co/Zh0nS7alOA

     280  23  65.60K
    Original >
    Tendencia de UNI tras el lanzamiento
     Alcista
    特朗普政府任命加密货币行业领袖加入新的政府顾问委员会,预示行业主流化。
  • Laura Shin Media Influencer C
     281.42K  @laurashin
    Brecca Stoll D
     18.01K  @breccastoll

    SCOOP: The Trump Admin just tapped leading CEOs in crypto, finance, prediction markets, and more for a BRAND NEW government advisory committee. Coinbases’s Brian Armstrong, Robinhood’s Vlad Tenev, and Polymarket’s Shayne Coplan are among the 35 named. https://t.co/Zh0nS7alOA

     280  23  65.60K
    Original >
    Tendencia de UNI tras el lanzamiento
     Alcista
    The Trump administration has established a new advisory committee, appointing multiple CEOs from the crypto and finance sectors, indicating mainstream adoption.
  • Milk Road Educator Influencer D
     94.09K  @MilkRoad
    Milk Road Educator Influencer D
     94.09K  @MilkRoad

    Everyone's missing (or completely ignoring) the larger impact of this @BlackRock x @Uniswap move. (And I get it, tokenized treasuries are boring as hell) But you’re focusing on the trees. Look at the forest! Here’s what I’m getting at… Moving onto DeFi rails unlocks a whole bunch of new opportunities for BlackRock, and most of those opportunities are born from: - Speed. - Availability. - New functionality. Pass me the coconut oil, and I’ll give you the rub… 1/ Speed TradFi settles SLOW. 2 business days for equities, and up to 5 business days for some bonds. For a firm like BlackRock - that costs them A LOT of money. Or better yet, A LOT of missed opportunities. When BlackRock trades, they trade in size. So 2-5 days' settlement often means billions of their dollars/assets being locked up in limbo (earning nothing). Assuming: → $50B is tied up in settlement at any one time (~0.5% of $10T AUM) → 5% annual return opportunity cost (if that capital were deployed) That would mean BlackRock is losing ~$6

     14  3  2.27K
    Original >
    Tendencia de UNI tras el lanzamiento
     Alcista
    BlackRock partners with Uniswap, DeFi can solve the huge opportunity cost of slow settlement in traditional finance.
  • フ ォ リ ス Trader TA_Analyst B
     124.73K  @follis_

    Largest asset manager in the world said they were buying $UNI And this is the chart +40% pump, then full retrace 24h later Price lower now than when the news broke In 2021 this would have gone 2X and then another +30% the following day too Altcoins might actually be cooked https://t.co/6OgI7YmEvw

    Uniswap Labs 🦄 Dev DeFi_Expert C
     1.47M  @Uniswap

    Today, we are announcing a strategic integration in collaboration with @Securitize, to make @BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL) available to trade via UniswapX through Securitize https://t.co/eXfnLTUkVU

     51  10  6.03K
    Original >
    Tendencia de UNI tras el lanzamiento
     Bajista
    UNI briefly rose after news of its partnership with BlackRock and then fully retraced; the author believes the altcoin market is weak.
  • Milk Road Educator Influencer D
     94.09K  @MilkRoad

    Everyone's missing (or completely ignoring) the larger impact of this @BlackRock x @Uniswap move. (And I get it, tokenized treasuries are boring as hell) But you’re focusing on the trees. Look at the forest! Here’s what I’m getting at… Moving onto DeFi rails unlocks a whole bunch of new opportunities for BlackRock, and most of those opportunities are born from: - Speed. - Availability. - New functionality. Pass me the coconut oil, and I’ll give you the rub… 1/ Speed TradFi settles SLOW. 2 business days for equities, and up to 5 business days for some bonds. For a firm like BlackRock - that costs them A LOT of money. Or better yet, A LOT of missed opportunities. When BlackRock trades, they trade in size. So 2-5 days' settlement often means billions of their dollars/assets being locked up in limbo (earning nothing). Assuming: → $50B is tied up in settlement at any one time (~0.5% of $10T AUM) → 5% annual return opportunity cost (if that capital were deployed) That would mean BlackRock is losing ~$6

     14  3  2.27K
    Original >
    Tendencia de UNI tras el lanzamiento
     Extremadamente alcista
    BlackRock partners with Uniswap, DeFi can solve the huge opportunity cost of slow settlement in traditional finance.
  • Harrison.dime DeFi_Expert Tokenomics_Expert B
     2.71K  @DfiHrn

    hmm.... first: the distinction between “compensating for temporary downsides” and “attracting permanent mercenaries” is cleaner in theory than in practice. you say DeFi liquidity mining is defensible because it compensates for hack risk. but in 2020–21, the dominant reason people farmed yields was not fear of hacks, it was that yields were huge. the risk was a footnote. those farmers left en masse when yields dropped. by your own definition, that was “bad” incentives attracting users who would not stay organically. yet Uniswap and Curve survived, and their liquidity today is deeper and more distributed than pre-farming eras. so maybe the clean distinction breaks down: sometimes mercenary capital performs a permanent infrastructure function (deeper books, tighter spreads) even if the humans operating it are purely extractive. second: you say incentives that bring in users who wouldn’t use a mature version are bad. but what if the mature version never arrives without them first? this is the classic two-sided market problem. a social app with zero users is useless. you cannot bootstrap a network purely organically in 2026 when attention is monopolized by incumbents. sometimes the choice is not “good incentives vs bad incentives” but “pay for distribution vs never reach scale at all.” the question is whether the incentives are designed to phase out and whether the product retains a subset. many successful Web2 platforms did exactly this, PayPal paid $10 per signup, dropbox gave free storage. crypto just made the payment a tradeable token, which made the subsidy visible and distorted the timeline. but the underlying mechanism is not categorically different. third: your cynical 2021–24 take is mostly true, but it implies a clean separation between “real product work” and “narrative engineering.” i think that separation is a luxury of hindsight. In 2021, it was not obvious which apps would become useful. dome projects that looked like pure speculation like NFT marketplaces which later became legitimate distribution channels for artists. the problem is not that people used incentives. the problem is that incentives were the only plan, with no product hypothesis to test afterward. If you had a thesis (if we subsidize liquidity for 12 months, we will retain X% because traders like the UX), and you tested it and pivoted, that’s product development. If you had no thesis and just extended emissions forever, that’s a casino. the distinction matters more than presence vs absence of incentives. fourth: the “charging fees, paying back in tokens” model you endorse is cleaner, but it has hidden friction. requiring users to pay fees and get rebated in tokens forces them to care about token price, tax events, and claiming processes. for mainstream users, this is not turning users into investors by default, it is a confusing chore. the reason apps don’t do this is not that they are greedy. It’s that most users prefer app pays me sometimes over i pay app and maybe get money back later. and last, you say successful apps now do bulk acquisition through utility, not incentives. name them. Farcaster? Had a paid invite system effectively a financial filter, not an incentive, but still monetary.

    Harrison.dime DeFi_Expert Tokenomics_Expert B
     2.71K  @DfiHrn

    btw even Ethereum L2s are paying millions in sequencer fees to attract users via gas subsidies. the pure product is so good people just come story is rare. usually there is a financial lever, just denominated in dollars instead of tokens, or hidden in infrastructure and not user grants. imo incentives must be deployed as a loan to your growth hypothesis, not as a salary to your community. if you are paying for a behavior that has no durable value after payments stop, you are burning money. but if the behavior (liquidity, content, referrals) creates assets that remain valuable even after the mercenaries leave, then the incentives were infrastructure spending

     1  1  65
    Original >
    Tendencia de UNI tras el lanzamiento
     Neutral
    If incentives can be turned into lasting liquidity, they can be considered infrastructure investment.
  • Milk Road Educator Influencer D
     94.09K  @MilkRoad
    Milk Road Educator Influencer D
     94.09K  @MilkRoad

    Tom Lee: "It looks like we're bottoming" - Banks are embracing crypto - Regulatory clarity is increasing - BlackRock is going into DeFi w/ Uniswap Crypto has a lot of tailwinds, the price just hasn't caught up yet. Are you onboard? https://t.co/k1GbLj5JyT https://t.co/ISgRJmg1sy

     106  13  13.94K
    Original >
    Tendencia de UNI tras el lanzamiento
     Alcista
    UNI is gaining institutional attention, may see a short‑term rally
  • Crypto Tony TA_Analyst Trader C
     561.42K  @CryptoTony__

    $UNI / $USD - Update Was the easiest short going. Any news pumps like that, always short. https://t.co/X4QykbcySR

     27  13  4.38K
    Original >
    Tendencia de UNI tras el lanzamiento
     Extremadamente bajista
    The author believes that after the positive UNI news rally, it is a good shorting opportunity, and the chart shows the price has dropped sharply.
  • Milk Road Educator Influencer D
     94.09K  @MilkRoad
    Milk Road Educator Influencer D
     94.09K  @MilkRoad

    BlackRock just made a strategic investment in @Uniswap and accumulated an undisclosed position in $UNI. (The world's largest asset manager is going full DeFi!) This isn't a press release or a pilot program. This is BlackRock putting its $2.2B tokenized Treasury fund, BUIDL, directly on a decentralized exchange. Lemme break down what just happened and why it matters: BlackRock will make BUIDL shares tradable on Uniswap, allowing pre-qualified investors to swap tokenized Treasuries around the clock using stablecoins. And to celebrate, they bought an undisclosed amount of $UNI. (Sending the token +40%, bottom to top, within an hour yesterday.) But the price action isn't the story. The story is what this signals about institutional adoption of DeFi infrastructure. When the largest asset manager on the planet, managing over $10T, decides to build on your protocol, that's validation that goes beyond speculation. They didn't choose a private blockchain. They didn't build their own infrastructure. They c

     72  7  22.36K
    Original >
    Tendencia de UNI tras el lanzamiento
     Extremadamente alcista
    BlackRock made a strategic investment in Uniswap and bought UNI, boosting institutional DeFi adoption and sending UNI price soaring.
  • UniChartz TA_Analyst Trader B
     1.74K  @UniChartz

    $UNI faced a sharp rejection from the upside and is now holding a key support zone. If this level breaks, it could trigger stop losses from buyers and lead to a quick, sharp drop. DYOR, NFA #UNI #uniusdt https://t.co/ThUG318m8Y

     3  0  188
    Original >
    Tendencia de UNI tras el lanzamiento
     Bajista
    UNI faced resistance rejection; if the support level breaks, a rapid decline is feared, and the chart shows a shorting opportunity.