Jupiter (JUP)

on-chain m&a debt restructuring: legacy: - absorb target protocol - inherit airdrop expectations - dilute main token supply jupiter: - acquire rainfi - isolate unrecorded droplet debt - discharge it with $JUICED - protect $JUP from dilution

How should Jupiter integrate $JUP deeper into its ecosystem? The vast majority of Solana tokens are at their lows right now. This is the year for teams to double down on token utility imo Bear markets are where you experiment - and figure out what actually works. The ones can figure it out in 2026, are likely the ones that run when the bull returns. What would you add to $JUP? 🪐

$JUP hit target

The best airdrops were the ones no one saw coming 🪂 Imo, the problem nowadays is that every project launches a points system: Points system → everyone farms → airdrop expectations → underwhelming airdrop → FUD If you look back at Jupiter’s first Jupuary airdrop: People used Jupiter because they genuinely loved it & it made their lives easier. They didn't expect an airdrop but in the end they did got massively rewarded. That’s why retrospective airdrops work so well: they reward real users, not farmers. Of course, not every project using points systems has a bad product - it’s just the current meta. But I’m starting to think the most interesting projects could be the ones not running points systems. If a product can attract users purely because it’s good - that’s a major bullish signal. A superior product as the marketing - not a future airdrop. What do you think?

Why Xiao-Xiao Left TradFi for Jupiter and What It Says About Where Crypto Is Going In this episode of When Shift Happens, I sit down with @xxjzhu, President of @JupiterExchange, and former digital assets lead at KKR, to discuss his unlikely journey from concert pianist to private equity operator to one of the most prominent builders in DeFi. It is a conversation about timing, conviction, product velocity, and the deeper shift from crypto as narrative to onchain finance as real infrastructure. At the centre of it all is a simple question: if stablecoins were only the beginning, how much of the financial world can eventually move onchain? From Concert Halls To Capital Markets What makes Xiao-Xiao interesting is that he did not arrive in crypto through the usual path. Before consulting in private equity, he was a professional concert pianist. Music, for him, was first a way to survive a cultural transition. After moving from China to Germany as a child, playing the piano gave him a way to connect, to be understood, and eventually to excel. He won national competitions, performed internationally, and even played for world leaders, including George Bush Snr. But success, especially early success, can also become a trap. He describes music as a deeply path-dependent life: once you are good at something, the world keeps rewarding you for doing more of it. What changed was not that he stopped loving music, but that he began to feel it was only a small part of a much bigger world. He wanted to understand how societies worked, how businesses were built, and how systems changed. That curiosity led him into philosophy, economics, management, BCG, and eventually KKR. His Real Crypto Awakening Xiao-Xiao did not have a lightbulb moment in crypto. Instead, he frames it as a gradual series of technological inflection points. At BCG, he worked on an early blockchain project with De Beers, building a provenance system for natural diamonds. That experience forced him to explain blockchain not as ideology, but as actual operating logic: nodes, smart contracts, verifiability, coordination. His deeper conviction came later, when he began to see two things happening at once. First, the boundary between traditional finance and crypto started to blur. Second, blockchain performance stopped being the main excuse. As he puts it, in the last 12 to 24 months, the infrastructure bottleneck has meaningfully eased. The question is no longer whether blockchains can theoretically scale. The question is what kind of businesses can now be built on top of them. That distinction is important. For years, crypto was dominated by infrastructure narratives. The promise was always one layer below actual usage. Xiao-Xiao’s read is that we are moving into a different phase now, one centred on the application layer, real adoption, and product-market fit. In his words, “this is about business building now.” Why He Left KKR For Jupiter The leap from KKR to Jupiter sounds dramatic, but in the conversation, it comes across as surprisingly rational. At KKR, Xiao-Xiao had one of the most prestigious roles possible in finance. He was working on landmark deals, helping the firm think through digital assets, and participating in internal efforts to evaluate whether crypto was something to avoid, experiment with, or commit to. That is part of what makes his answer credible. He saw institutional finance from the inside. He saw the curiosity, the fear, the optionality, and also the slowness. Large institutions can move massive amounts of capital, but only after long cycles of decision-making. Crypto, by contrast, offered a place where change could be made directly. His line on this is one of the clearest in the episode: “to really affect change and have impact, it’s probably faster to do directly onchain than to wait for corporate decisions to get there.” Why Jupiter specifically? He gives four reasons. First, product track record. Jupiter kept building tools that people genuinely loved. Second, market size. He sees onchain finance not as a niche inside crypto, but as a much larger future category. Third, integrity. He contrasts Jupiter with projects that rode narratives, launched tokens, and faded. What impressed him was that Jupiter kept shipping through both bull and bear markets. And fourth, complementarity. The founders were already exceptional on product and engineering; he believed he could help connect Jupiter to the wider world beyond crypto-native circles. The Bigger Idea The most ambitious part of the conversation is Xiao-Xiao’s description of Jupiter’s long-term vision. He argues that the future will not belong to fragmented point solutions that force users to juggle chains, wallets, bridges, and interfaces. It will belong to products that abstract this complexity away. That is why he talks so much about aggregation. In his view, users do not want five different apps for five different financial actions. They want the “fastest, cheapest, most convenient” experience. That is also the logic behind @JupGlobal, which he describes as the first onchain QR payment solution that allows a small merchant “in the Vietnamese jungle” to accept onchain assets with zero fees. The Shift By the end of the episode, Xiao-Xiao lands on a more radical idea. He thinks tokenisation can become much bigger than most people currently imagine, but only if the industry stops settling for shallow replicas of off-chain assets. A tokenised asset that offers weaker rights, weaker governance, and weaker liquidity than its traditional equivalent will never fully win. The real opportunity is not merely mirroring old structures onchain. It is rethinking capital formation itself. In that sense, Xiao-Xiao’s journey mirrors the industry thesis he is now helping to build. Both are about refusing to stay inside the safer, narrower version of what already exists. Both are bets on a bigger arena. And both depend on the same quality: the willingness to leave a validated path when you start to see that the real opportunity sits somewhere further ahead. 👉If you enjoyed reading the summary, head over to When Shift Happens on YouTube or your favorite podcast platform to access the full convo.

Jupiter processed 100 billion API requests the past year 🪐 That's how many times Solana dApps called Jupiter's infrastructure. 100 BILLION - let that sink in. Jupiter is literally becoming the infra layer for Solana DeFi. And every time someone swaps through it’s Swap API Jupiter collects on-chain fees. 50% of those fees go directly to buying back $JUP The more Solana DeFi grows, the more that matters for $JUP in the long-term