Bitcoin (BTC)

Remember: Bitcoin doesn't need the US government The US government needs Bitcoin Bitcoin is designed to be censorship-resistant and trustless money It's a perfect fit for the world's reserve currency Countries don't have to trust one another Individuals don't have to trust one another They can just do business without relying on anybody controlling the system If the US government pulls support, Bitcoin will just keep going It doesn't care about individuals or countries The price may fall temporarily, but eventually it'll be so cheap that people will start accumulating again Money is power If the US government doesn't support Bitcoin, another country will buy its share and the US government may lose its place as the superpower of the world But that's fine Regimes change Bitcoin stays the same, no matter what's happening in politics

Barry Silbert bought Bitcoin in 2012 at $7-8 Built Grayscale from there. Became the guy who actually gave institutions a way into crypto when everyone else was still trying to explain what a private key was Now he's doing the same thing with @bittensor DCG launched Yuma for the $TAO ecosystem. Started funds specifically for subnet tokens. Grayscale set up a Bittensor Trust so institutions can buy in without touching wallets. His take is interesting. He doesn't see Bitcoin doing another 500x from here. But Bittensor? He thinks it can because it's solving actual problems. Not just digital gold - it's infrastructure for decentralized AI that's being built and used right now. Same pattern as early Bitcoin. Decentralized infrastructure going up against centralized players. Open vs closed. Permissionless vs gated. Supply looks like Bitcoin too. 21 million cap. Already had its first halving in December. And while most people are still confused about what Bittensor even does, institutions are moving. BitGo add