SUI (SUI)

Big week for @SuiNetwork builders: 1. @walrusprotocol is now storing 30TB of Sui's full checkpoint history 2. Sui launched a $500K incentive program for DeFi teams Here's what shipped ↓ https://t.co/fBb5ZPTJ7P

Second: Sui launched the DeFi Moonshots Program. Rolling applications. Roughly 10 teams are selected per year. Up to $500K in incentives plus engineering support. The bar is high. They're looking for protocols that create new categories. https://t.co/ZwbAvbKRcn

First: The Walrus archival system. Sui's full checkpoint history, 30TB of it, is now stored on Walrus. Anyone can access it, verify it's correct, and it costs ~15-18K WAL with automatic backup redundancy across the decentralized storage network. https://t.co/9ZuQfUW5oI https://t.co/JV2hgZX32i

Regarding @nexaxyz, let's see things from both sides. Businesses have operational costs; salaries for devs, interns, etc, paid from revenue, which is why most web3 companies market and farm users aggressively. For established chains and ecosystems, it's easier: they have users, VCs investing, and big players using their protocols for revenue. In Nexa's case, they're in an ecosystem with barely any users, almost no liquidity (worsened by the bear market), and most Sui protocols surviving on incentives, not operational revenue. Call it what you will, but Nexa did their best to survive yet it didn't work, as they weren't making enough to keep operations running. That you farmed them doesn't mean they should borrow money just to airdrop you. It's real ignorance and stupidity, if we're honest, to expect airdrops from every project you use, when you weren't forced or coerced into using them. There's a reason you're asked to do due diligence before buying or farming anything. You knew other platforms had better fees than Nexa, but still used them (it honestly doesn't make sense how people used Nexa with those ridiculous fees and expected airdrops when there was no raise whatsoever). Reality is Sui as an ecosystem is very immature ( low liquidity and user, almost no institutional players either compared to Eth and Solana not to mention lack of VC pipelines), so expecting a protocol to hand out airdrops just based on fees they generated from a handful of users is inconsiderate. Nexa isn’t the only one to have shutdown or left the ecosystem and they certainly won’t be the last. Until our ecosystem matures, it’s best you farm selectively, look at protocols runway, analyze their fee model, check funding history and backers etc before you get to farming them. In simpler terms, you have no one to blame for your losses on Nexa but yourself. Suck it up, move on, and now know better than to farm just anything for airdrops. Crying won't change that businesses have costs, and with scarce users, liquidity, and tough market conditions in our ecosystem, you should know better than to "farm" these protocols.

Good evening CT. the suiUSDe SUI base pair on @ferra_protocol changed my flow: park idle in a yield dollar, tap SUI when signal shows, then slip back to stzble without juggling pools. DLMM bins around the peg make spreads feel tight even when SUI twitches, so quotes land close to intent and fees don’t punish. daily quests reset at 00:00 UTC; I set a boring loop: check in, one tiny swap through the base pair, review LP drift, then stop. consistency compounds more than size. Trading Guild quietly boosts this stack when you actually act, not when you talk. asks: - show a per‑bin fee and yield heatmap for suiUSDe SUI so LPs can shift with facts - add a visible reset coumtdown next to quests so streaks don’t die - optional auto‑rebalance band that nudges bins when SUI moves beyond a set delta with a clear log this feels like capital hygiene: anchor, act, exit, repeat. vibes fade, foundations persist. 🫡

imagine how bad things must be for hyperliquid, monad, aptos and sei to be behind sui on this ranking

Look at the comments on this tweet Don't say that the market as a whole is also falling Even if it's ETH‑denominated, the chart looks the same Those directly involved are blinded $SUI https://t.co/dQRrhnoLCB https://t.co/oPh9Qis4fa

To sum it up 💧 $Sui enforces onchain allowlist of identity providers (only pre-approved login providers like Google are allowed) 💧 Impersonation via AWS Cognito is not possible because issuer strings cannot be forged (a login provider cannot pretend to be another provider) 💧 Extra JWT validation at the app level is unnecessary since zkLogin assumes trusted issuers (the system already trusts the official login providers it works with) They acknowledge useful feedback: 💧 Will improve parsing and verification practices (make how login data is read more strict and standardized) 💧 Plan to adopt canonical JSON enforcement (force login data to follow one exact format so it cannot be misread or manipulated)